• Annotatsiya

At the present stage of development of science, the anthropocentric paradigm prevails in linguistics, that is, the integration process in linguistics has won the first place, passing through the comparative historical approach of the XIX century and the structural-structural paradigms of the XX century. In the study of linguistic phenomena, comparative studies, mainly on the basis of an anthropocentric approach to linguocultural studies, are effective and useful. The formation of linguocultural research is often associated with archetypal concepts, which are based on the ideas of the mythological school, i.e., the concepts of the representatives of the school of comparative mythology. Terms such as "myth", "mythology", "mythological school", "mythological thinking", "mythology", "mythology" are the main terms in the study of the mythological worldview. then claim that the main elements of artistic, poetic activity are based on the teachings of myth and mythology. Myth is described as a primitive form of thinking, a means of knowing and perceiving the phenomena of reality around man. The evolution of the mythological school emerged as a result of the formation of comparative mythology, the primary task of the founders of the school was to identify the original myths and legends using the positive descriptions of the mythological theory that formed the basis of poetic creation. To achieve specific goals, school representatives collected a number of written memorabilia, fairy tales, epics, songs, and other materials. The research of this school of comparative mythology has contributed to the transmission of folklore to generations and the development of mythology, and Karakalpak mythology has not been studied on the basis of the principles of comparative approach, and this is a sad situation