O'zbekcha
English
Русский
THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN PHYSICS EDUCATION
Maqola haqida umumiy ma'lumotlar
Emerging technologies, including virtual reality (VR) simulations, interactive coding environments, augmented reality (AR) visualizations, and adaptive learning platforms, have immense potential for transforming physics education. VR simulations can enhance students' spatial reasoning and conceptual understanding, while interactive coding environments encourage computational thinking and hands-on learning. AR visualizations can improve spatial awareness and engagement, and adaptive platforms can personalize the educational experience to meet individual needs. This paper examines the impact of these cutting-edge technologies on teaching and learning in physics, drawing on research from various studies. VR, interactive coding, AR, and adaptive platforms allow for more dynamic, engaging, and personalized learning experiences. By embracing these advancements, educators can foster the next generation of physicists and STEM leaders, equipping them with the skills and knowledge required to thrive in an increasingly technology-driven world. The integration of these innovative technologies is crucial for preparing students for the challenges and opportunities of the future.
- Johnson-Glenberg, M. C. (2018). Immersive VR and education: Embodied design principles that include gesture and hand controls. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 81.
- Wieman, C. E. (2014). Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8319-8320.
- Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: Comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students' ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 149-173.
- Belova, N., & Eilks, I. (2015). Participatory action research in science education at secondary and university level as a strategy to promote education for sustainable development. CEPS Journal, 5(1), 167-184.
- Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29-40.
- Bonde, M. T., Makransky, G., Wandall, J., Larsen, M. V., Morsing, M., Jarmer, H., & Sommer, M. O. (2014). Improving biotech education through gamified laboratory simulations. Nature Biotechnology, 32(7), 694-697.
- Karnam, D. K., Muvva, J. B., Akula, A. K., & Gunukula, S. (2019). Integrating computational thinking and programming with physics education using Jupyter Notebooks. European Journal of Physics, 40(4), 045702.
- Moore, E. B., Herzog, T. A., & Perkins, K. K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided-inquiry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 257-268.
- Caballero, M. D., Kohlmyer, M. A., & Schatz, M. F. (2012). Implementing and assessing computational modeling in introductory mechanics. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020106.
- Choi, B., & Baek, Y. (2011). Exploring factors of media characteristic influencing flow in learning through virtual worlds. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2382-2394.
- Ibáñez, M. B., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2018). Augmented reality for STEM learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 123, 109-123.
- Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
- Radu, I. (2014). Augmented reality in education: A meta-review and cross-media analysis. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(6), 1533-1543.
- Salmi, H., Kaasinen, A., & Kallunki, V. (2012). Towards an open learning environment via augmented reality (AR): Visualising the invisible in science centres and schools for teacher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 284-295.
- Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2017). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handbook of research on learning and instruction, 522-560.
- Pane, J. F., Steiner, E. D., Baird, M. D., & Hamilton, L. S. (2015). Continued Progress: Promising Evidence on Personalized Learning. Research Report. RR-1365-BMGF. RAND Corporation.
- Phelan, S. (2020). Using adaptive learning technology to personalise mathematics education. Irish Educational Studies, 39(2), 263-276.
- Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22(1), 89-102.
Maftunzada, S. A. (2024). THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN PHYSICS EDUCATION. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 5(7.8), 71–79. https://doi.org/
Maftunzada, Sayed. “THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN PHYSICS EDUCATION.” Academic Research in Educational Sciences, vol. 7.8, no. 5, 2024, pp. 71–79, https://doi.org/.
Maftunzada, A. 2024. THE TRANSFORMATIVE POTENTIAL OF EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN PHYSICS EDUCATION. Academic Research in Educational Sciences. 7.8(5), pp.71–79.