LEGAL ANALYSIS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF SHM FORGERY CRIMES THAT RESULT IN LOSSES TO OTHER PARTIES IS ASSOCIATED WITH (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 252/PID. B/2015/ PN. PMS) IN INDONESIA
Maqola haqida umumiy ma'lumotlar
The purpose of the study is to know and analyze criminal law studies on forgery of letter evidence, analyze the judge's legal considerations in solving SHM forgery crimes associated with the study of Decision Number 252 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN. PMS and analyzing the legal consequences of the crime of forgery of SHM letters are associated with the study of Decision Number 252 / Pid.B / 2015 / PN. PMS This type of research is normative juridical. The nature of the research used is analytical descriptive research. This study used library data collection techniques (librarry Research). Data collection tools are carried out by document study. The data analysis used in this thesis research is qualitative data analysis. The act of falsification is a type of violation of truth and trustworthiness, with the aim of gaining advantage for oneself or others. That the form of the stamp or code stamp in front of the certificate cover, namely the Certificate of Property Rights Number 1525 Bantan Village in the name of YUNIARTI, SH has the code 02.02 is not true, which is true at the office of the National Land Agency of Pematangsiantar City with the code 02.03; Considering, that in accordance with the above considerations Yuniarti, SH as the wife of the defendant who has used a letter in the form of a certificate that has been forged as a credit guarantee to PT Perkreditan Diori. The legal consequences received as a result of forgery are Declaring Defendant RAMLAN legally and conclusively guilty of the crime of "Assisting in Forgery of Authentic Deeds"; Sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment for 5 (five) months; Stipulate that the period of detention that the defendant has served is deducted entirely from the sentence imposed; Order that the Defendant be detained; Charge the Defendant to pay the cost of the case in the amount of Rp 1,000.- (one thousand rupiah).
Adami, C. (2002). Kejahatan Mengenai Pemalsuan. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Adrian Sutedi, S. (2023). Sertifikat hak atas tanah. Sinar Grafika.
Ali, M. (2022). Dasar-dasar hukum pidana. Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief, S. H. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Prenada Media.
Chazawi, A., & Ardi Ferdian. (2014). Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan: Tindak Pidana yang Menyerang Kepentingan Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Maasyarakat Mengenai Kebenaran Isi Tulisan dan Berita yang Disampaikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fachmi, K. H. M. P. B. (2011). Demi Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Hamzah, A. (2009). Delik-Delik Tertentu dalam KUHP. Jakarta, Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, M. Y. (2017). Hukum acara perdata: tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian, dan putusan pengadilan. Sinar Grafika. Lamintang, P. A. F., &
Lamintang, T. (2009). Delik-delik khusus kejahatan membahayakan kepercayaan umum terhadap surat, alat pembayaran, alat bukti, dan peradilan. Sinar Grafika.
Rusianto, A. (2016). Tindak pidana & pertanggungjawaban pidana: tinjauan kritis melalui konsistensi antara asas, teori, dan penerapannya. Kencana.
Silalahi, U. (2010). Metode Penelitian Sosial. PT Refika Aditama.
Soehartono, I. (1999). Metode Peneltian Sosial Suatu Teknik Penelitian Bidang Kesejahteraan Sosial Lainnya. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Soekanto, S. (2007). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat.
Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.
Soimin, S. (1993). Status Hak dan Pengadaan Tanah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 24
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) pasal 263
Pasal 5 ayat (1) huruf b angka 1 KUHAP
Pasal 38 ayat (1) KUHAP
Pasal 39 ayat (1) dan (2) KUHAP
Pasal 133 ayat (1) KUHAP
Pasal 264 ayat (2) KUHP jo
Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP,
Pasal 264 ayat (2) KUHP jo
Pasal 56 ke-2 KUHP
Pasal 263 ayat (2) KUHP jo
Pasal 55 ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP,
Pasal 263 ayat (2) KUHP jo
Pasal 56 ayat (2) KUHP,
Pasal 264 ayat (2) KUHP jo
Pasal 56 ke-2 KUHP
Sinaga, A. ., Zulyadi, R. ., & Siregar, T. . (2023). LEGAL ANALYSIS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF SHM FORGERY CRIMES THAT RESULT IN LOSSES TO OTHER PARTIES IS ASSOCIATED WITH (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 252/PID. B/2015/ PN. PMS) IN INDONESIA. Academic Research in Educational Sciences, 4(6), 116–128. https://doi.org/
Sinaga, Anci Yuniza, et al. “LEGAL ANALYSIS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF SHM FORGERY CRIMES THAT RESULT IN LOSSES TO OTHER PARTIES IS ASSOCIATED WITH (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 252/PID. B/2015/ PN. PMS) IN INDONESIA.” Academic Research in Educational Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4, 2023, pp. 116–128, https://doi.org/.
Sinaga, ., Zulyadi, ., and Siregar, . 2023. LEGAL ANALYSIS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF SHM FORGERY CRIMES THAT RESULT IN LOSSES TO OTHER PARTIES IS ASSOCIATED WITH (STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 252/PID. B/2015/ PN. PMS) IN INDONESIA. Academic Research in Educational Sciences. 6(4), pp.116–128.